Investment Primer: The U.S. Size & Style Composite

Share

What, Why, and How of U.S. Size & Style

The U.S. Size & Style composite includes funds that are the foundational building blocks of most equity portfolios. These funds invest in U.S. stocks, categorized by two primary dimensions: company size (market capitalization) and investment style. The “why” is straightforward: these funds allow investors to precisely target specific segments of the U.S. market, from large, stable blue-chip companies to small, high-growth innovators.

The “how” is achieved through various approaches, which ETF Action classifies under the Strategy field. Many funds are Beta strategies that passively track well-known indexes like the S&P 500. Others are Factor strategies that target specific characteristics like value or momentum, or Tactical strategies that actively over/under weight specific sectors of factors based on proprietary screens. This combination of size, style, and strategy creates the core matrix for constructing a diversified U.S. equity allocation.

Portfolio Construction Approaches

U.S. Size & Style funds can be used in several ways to build the equity portion of a portfolio. The right approach depends on an investor’s goals, risk tolerance, and desired level of involvement.

  • Core: This is the simplest approach, involving the use of a single, broad-based fund as the central holding. This can be a passive fund, such as a U.S. Large Cap Blend ETF that tracks the S&P 500, to provide diversified market exposure. Alternatively, an investor might choose a diversified active fund as their core, believing in the manager’s skill to navigate different market environments.
  • Build Your Core: Instead of using a single fund, this approach involves combining different styles or factors to construct a customized core. For example, an investor might forgo a “blend” fund and instead combine a U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and a U.S. Large Cap Growth ETF. This allows them to tilt their portfolio toward the style they believe will perform better, while still maintaining broad market exposure.
  • Concentrated Alpha Strategies: This approach involves blending more focused “satellite” positions around a central core to seek alpha, or returns above the market benchmark. These strategies can be active (a manager picking a small number of stocks) or passive (tracking a very niche or alternatively-weighted index). The key characteristic is that they have a high active share, meaning their holdings differ significantly from their category benchmark. This high active share introduces significant tracking error, causing the fund’s performance to deviate substantially from the benchmark. This deviation creates the opportunity for significant outperformance (alpha) if the strategy is successful, but also carries the risk of significant underperformance.

A Practical Guide to Locating Funds in the ETF Action Database

A proper peer group is essential for any comparative analysis. A good starting point is the U.S. Size & Style ETF Dashboard, which groups all relevant ETFs by composite and category, with hyperlinks to the ETF Database for deeper analysis.

Foundational Screening: Building the Initial Universe

The first step is to use the top-level classification filters to isolate funds within the U.S. Size & Style composite.

  • Step 1: Select the Database. Navigate to the ETF, Mutual Fund, or other desired database.
  • Step 2: Filter by Asset Class. Select Asset Class = Equity.
  • Step 3: Filter by Composite. Select Composite = Size & Style – U.S.
  • Step 4: Filter by Category. To focus on a specific segment, select the desired Category (e.g., U.S. Large Cap – Value, U.S. Mid Cap – Blend, U.S. Small Cap – Growth).

For more granular searches, you can also filter by Strategy (Beta, Factor, Tactical) to target a specific management style, or by Selection to isolate funds focused on a particular characteristic like ‘Dividend’ or ‘Value’.

Advanced Filtering: Refining Your Peer Group

After the foundational screen, the list can be refined by screening for outliers and unique characteristics.

  • Brand (Issuer): Investors may prefer to stick with established fund providers with long track records.
  • Assets Under Management (AUM): Setting a minimum AUM threshold can screen out smaller funds that may face viability risks or be difficult to trade.
  • Expense Ratio: Costs are a critical factor. Screening by expense ratio can eliminate high-cost funds, as fees are a direct drag on returns.
  • Liquidity (ETFs only): For ETFs, metrics like average daily trading volume and bid-ask spreads can be used to screen out illiquid funds.
  • Group: Use the Group filter to find funds with special circumstances, such as those that exclude a particular sector (e.g., ‘Ex-Financials’), focus on recent IPOs, or have other unique mandates.
  • ESG Flag: For investors with sustainability goals, the ESG Flag allows you to screen for funds that apply environmental, social, or governance criteria.

A Framework for Evaluating U.S. Size & Style Funds

For equity funds, a thorough evaluation involves a two-step quantitative process followed by a qualitative review. The first step is to assess the fund’s top-level risk and return performance against an appropriate benchmark. The second, more detailed step involves looking through the fund to understand what is truly “under the hood.” This is where ETF Action’s institutional-grade datasets become essential, allowing an analyst to understand both how a fund performed and why.

Risk/Return Analysis: The Importance of Benchmarks

The foundational step in any fund evaluation is to analyze its historical risk and return profile. This analysis provides context and helps answer the fundamental question: “Did this fund deliver a return that justifies the risk it took relative to its market segment?” To do this effectively, a proper benchmark is required.

ETF Action assigns a Beta Tracker to each category—a specific, broad-based ETF chosen to represent that market segment (e.g., a large, liquid S&P 500 ETF for the U.S. Large Cap Blend category). Key metrics from the Risk & Return report should be compared against this Beta Tracker to gauge performance. While the examples below are some of the most common, ETF Action’s comprehensive datasets provide a full suite of risk statistics for deeper insights.

  • Total Return: How has the fund performed over various time periods compared to its benchmark?
  • Standard Deviation (Volatility): Was the fund more or less volatile than its benchmark?
  • Sharpe Ratio: Did the fund provide better risk-adjusted returns?
  • Beta & R-Squared: How sensitive was the fund to the movements of its benchmark, and how much of its performance can be explained by the benchmark?
  • Alpha: Did the fund add value beyond what would be expected based on its market risk (beta)?
  • Tracking Error: How closely did the fund’s returns track its benchmark?
  • Up/Down Capture Ratios: How did the fund perform relative to its benchmark during periods of market gains versus market losses?

This initial risk/return analysis sets the stage for a deeper investigation. If a fund has outperformed, the next step is to find out why. If it has underperformed, the goal is to understand the source of the drag.

Quantitative Analysis: The Power of Look-Through Analytics

A fund’s name tells you its category, but its holdings tell you its actual exposures. Look-through analysis is critical for understanding the “why” behind the performance numbers and for effective portfolio construction.

  • Sector & Industry Exposure: Does a “U.S. Large Cap Blend” fund have a 40% weight to the Technology sector? Is a “Value” fund heavily exposed to Financials? Understanding these sector bets is crucial, as they are often the primary drivers of a fund’s performance relative to the broad market.
  • Factor Tilts & Fundamentals: The Selection field in the database identifies a fund’s stated focus (e.g., ‘Value’, ‘Dividend’, ‘Quality’). Look-through analysis is then used to verify if the fund’s portfolio characteristics align with this label. For a fund with a ‘Value’ selection, an analyst should use look-through data to confirm that its portfolio has a lower average Price-to-Earnings (P/E) or Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio than a “Growth” or “Blend” fund.
  • Concentration: Look-through data reveals how concentrated a fund is in its top holdings. A fund with 60% of its assets in the top 10 stocks has a much different risk profile than a broadly diversified fund with only 20% in its top 10, even if they are in the same category.
  • Overlap Analysis: When combining funds (such as in a “Build Your Core” or “Core and Satellite” approach), overlap analysis is vital. Using look-through tools to see how many holdings two funds share helps avoid unintentional concentration. If two different funds both hold large, overlapping positions in the same handful of mega-cap tech stocks, the portfolio may not be as diversified as it appears.

While a detailed, manual look-through analysis provides the deepest insights, it can be time-intensive. ETF Action’s derived analytics are designed to simplify this process by providing a completely objective, rules-based framework. It’s important to distinguish between classifications and derived analytics. The classifications, such as the Equity – Size Assignment (Large, Mid, Small) or Equity – Style Assignment (Value, Core, Growth), are rules-based labels that place a fund into a specific bucket, which is powerful for initial screening. The derived analytics, like the Equity – Sector Concentration rating or the various factor tilt scores, offer a more nuanced view. They quantify the intensity of a fund’s characteristics on a numeric scale relative to a broad market benchmark. By removing subjective opinion and marketing claims, this dual system of objective classifications and quantitative ratings provides a powerful framework to more efficiently search for funds and conduct an initial evaluation, allowing users to quickly identify funds that truly align with their desired portfolio characteristics.

Qualitative Analysis: Evaluating the Strategy

The Strategy classification provides a high-level guide to a fund’s approach, which dictates the qualitative evaluation.

  • Beta: For passively managed funds, the key is to understand the index methodology. What are the rules for including a stock? How is the index weighted? The Implementation field details this, showing whether the fund is market-cap weighted, equal-weighted, or uses an alternative scheme. A market-cap weighted index will be dominated by the largest companies, while an equal-weighted index gives the same importance to every company—a critical distinction that dramatically affects performance.
  • Factor & Tactical: For actively managed funds, the focus is on the manager’s process. How do they define “value” or “quality”? Is their stock-selection process repeatable and consistent? The qualitative review should confirm that the manager’s philosophy is actually reflected in the portfolio’s look-through characteristics.

Ready to Put This Knowledge to Work?

The best insights come from the best tools. Join ETF Action to screen, compare, and analyze thousands of ETFs with our premium suite of resources for serious investors.