Buffer ETFs Gather $635M as October Resets Lead Inflows

Share

Weekly Channel Summary

The Buffer channel ended the week with $102.27B in AUM spread across 554 ETFs from 22 issuers. Net flows totaled $635M for the five-day period, extending a strong run that has produced $14,133M in year-to-date inflows and $17,423M over the trailing 12 months. The channel continues to see steady accumulation, with weekly inflows representing a continuation of the broader 2026 trend of growth in defined-outcome strategies.

This Week’s Performance Leaders and Laggards

Commodity led category performance for the week with a 0.74% gain, followed by Equity at 0.55% and Fixed Income at 0.37%, while Crypto was the lone decliner at -1.33%. Equity, which dominates the channel with 531 funds, also leads on a longer-term basis with a 9.30% YTD return and 11.53% over the trailing year. Fixed Income remains under pressure across longer horizons, down 6.82% YTD and 8.28% over one year, while Crypto has also struggled on a YTD basis at -4.87% despite its stronger 3-month showing of 8.31%. Among individual funds, POCT stood out as the top asset gatherer for the week, reflecting continued investor interest in near-term October-dated buffer resets.

Analyzing the Weekly Flows

The Buffer channel drew $635M in net inflows over the trailing five days. Equity-linked buffer strategies accounted for virtually all of the activity, pulling in $633M against $101.99B in AUM, while Fixed Income added a modest $4M. Crypto-linked buffer products were the lone outflow category among asset classes, shedding $2M, a minor figure relative to the channel’s overall scale. By outcome period, the October reset cohort led all segments with $331M in weekly inflows, followed by September resets at $115M and the Laddered strategy at $105M, while the April reset cohort saw the largest outflow at -$37M.

Flows by Asset Class

Asset Class Fund Count AUM 5 Day 30 Day 90 Day YTD 1 Year
Equity 530 $101.99B $633M $1,234M $5,147M $14,189M $17,419M
Fixed Income 2 $18M $4M $1M $0M -$13M -$16M
Commodity 1 $53M $0M $0M $3M $2M $18M
Crypto 20 $151M -$2M -$9M -$33M -$44M $2M

Flows by Outcome Period / Strategy

Outcome Period / Strategy Fund Count AUM 5 Day 30 Day 90 Day YTD 1 Year
Buffer Reset: October 46 $6.03B $331M $42M $298M -$695M $556M
Buffer Reset: September 40 $6.63B $115M $868M $1,375M $675M $783M
Buffer Reset: Laddered 29 $19.46B $105M $444M $1,399M $4,049M $4,922M
Buffer Reset: Quarterly 43 $9.86B $97M $27M $914M $2,660M $3,307M
Buffer Reset: August 35 $5.10B $57M $245M $1,121M $570M $501M
Buffer Reset: June 40 $6.52B $10M -$26M $48M $1,987M $1,732M
Buffer Reset: Dynamic 11 $2.43B $6M $61M $96M $440M $625M
Buffer Reset: March 31 $5.12B $5M $18M -$80M $488M $533M
Buffer Reset: Semi-Annually 10 $1.23B $3M $13M $44M $44M $26M
Buffer Reset: Daily 4 $10M $0M $0M $2M $6M $1M
Buffer Reset: Monthly 2 $2M -$1M $2M $2M $2M $2M
Buffer Reset: Dynamic 1 $39M -$2M -$1M -$0M -$4M -$3M
Buffer Reset: May 34 $4.97B -$3M -$90M -$156M $1,741M $1,713M
Buffer Reset: December 34 $6.18B -$5M -$94M -$262M -$473M -$35M
Buffer Reset: July 54 $7.28B -$7M $141M $1,091M $741M $176M
Buffer Reset: November 26 $4.02B -$12M -$118M -$289M -$547M $774M
Buffer Reset: January 44 $7.03B -$14M -$64M -$254M $1,070M $822M
Buffer Reset: February 25 $4.75B -$14M -$205M -$247M $817M $485M
Buffer Reset: April 44 $5.58B -$37M -$37M $17M $561M $501M

Top & Bottom 5 ETFs by 5-Day Flow

Fund-level flows were led by POCT, which gathered $75M over the week, followed by ZOCT at $54M and NOCT at $52M, underscoring continued demand for October-dated and longer-duration protection structures. On the outflow side, the Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF – April (KAPR) led redemptions at -$36M, followed by the Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF – March (NMAR) at -$27M. These outflows were notably smaller in magnitude than the top inflow funds, consistent with the channel’s net positive weekly flow.

Ticker Fund Name 5-Day Flow
Inflows
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF – October $75M
ZOCT Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 1 Yr October $54M
NOCT Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF- October $52M
DDFG Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF $52M
BALT Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF $46M
Outflows
KAPR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF – April -$36M
NMAR Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF – March -$27M
NJUL Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF – July -$10M
PFEB Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF – February -$8M
PNOV Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF – November -$7M

Note: the following fund(s) were excluded from the flow totals above because the weekly flow exceeds 75% of the fund’s AUM and may be the result of a custom rebalance: DDFA (-$51M).

Issuer League Table Update

FT Vest and Innovator remain the dominant forces in the Buffer channel, commanding 48.62% and 36.60% of total AUM, respectively, with Allianz a distant third at 6.01%. Innovator led all issuers in weekly inflows at $296M, followed closely by FT Vest at $215M and PGIM adding $38M, together accounting for the bulk of the channel’s net creations. On the outflow side, Day Hagan recorded the largest weekly redemption among issuers at -$2M, a negligible amount relative to the channel’s overall inflow momentum, with VistaShares and Measured Risk Portfolios also posting minor outflows.

Top 5 Issuers by AUM

Issuer Fund Count AUM AUM Market Share
FT Vest 122 $49.72B 48.62%
Innovator 162 $37.43B 36.60%
Allianz 60 $6.15B 6.01%
PGIM 47 $1.89B 1.85%
AB Funds 3 $1.74B 1.70%

Top & Bottom 3 Issuers by 5-Day Flow

Issuer 5-Day Flow
Inflows
Innovator $296M
FT Vest $215M
PGIM $38M
Outflows
Day Hagan -$2M
VistaShares -$1M
Measured Risk Portfolios -$0M

For a deeper dive into these trends, access our FREE, in-depth Buffer ETF reports in the right side panel of this page.

Disclosures

This material is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. All investments, including ETFs, involve risk, including the possible loss of principal. Investors should consider their investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses carefully before investing.

This analysis was developed by the team at ETF Action. We leverage advanced AI tools to assist in the drafting and refinement of our content, based on our expert prompts, direction, and final review.